Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Beck, John H. Title: Distributive Justice and the Rules of the Corporation: Partial Versus General Equilibrium Analysis Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 355-362 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: Progressives have advocated reforms of rules governing corporations to achieve greater distributive justice, but Maitland (2001) has argued that corporate rules are distributively neutral and that changing the rules will have no long run impact on distributive justice. These different conclusions stem from the use of two different methods of economic analysis, partial equilibrium and general equilibrium models. A change in the rules governing corporations in a “large” sector of the economy is appropriately analyzed using a general equilibrium analysis, supporting the conclusion that changes in the rules may affect distributive justice in the long run. However, a partial equilibrium analysis of a change in the rules of corporations affecting a “small” part of the economy such as a single firm or even all firms in a small state supports the claim that such changes cannot affect distributive justice. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010642/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:355-362_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Church, Bryan Author-Name: Gaa, James C. Author-Name: Khalid Nainar, S. M. Author-Name: Shehata, Mohamed M. Title: Experimental Evidence Relating to the Person-Situation Interactionist Model of Ethical Decision Making Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 363-383 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: According to a widely credited model in the business ethics literature, ethical decisions are a function of two kinds of factors, personal (individual) and situational, and these factors interact with each other. According to a contrary view of decision making that is widely held in some areas of business research, individuals’ decisions about ethical issues (and subsequent actions) are purely a function of their self-interest. The laboratory experiment reported in this paper provides a test of the person-situation interactionist model, using the general theoretical and experimental framework used in the experimental economics literature. One individual and two situational factors relating to moral intensity were examined which may influence decisions to misrepresent information in the course of business activities. The individual and one situational variable were significantly related to participants’ actions. The interactions among individual and situation variables were not individually significant, although the model including interactions had a much higher level of statistical significance. Gender was significant, both directly and in interaction with moral development, suggesting that it may be worthy of further examination. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010654/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:363-383_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Brooke Hamilton III, J. Author-Name: Berken, Eric J. Title: Exxon at Grand Bois, Louisiana: A Three-Level Analysis of Management Decision Making and Corporate Conduct Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 385-408 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: In the early 1990s, managers at Exxon decided to seek lower cost disposal in Louisiana for oil-field wastes declared hazardous in Alabama. This decision resulted in injuries to the residents of Grand Bois, Louisiana; the disposal company; Exxon; and the oil industry in the state. Given the need for business and society to manage business operations for mutual benefit, it is essential to understand why businesses injure the public so that similar incidents do not happen again. The authors use three analytical perspectives to suggest how corporations may make unethical decisions without purposefully setting out to do so: their managers may fail to understand changing social expectations for corporate behavior; they may adopt organizational structures, policies, and procedures that block ethical action in the name of efficiency; and they may follow unwritten rules of behavior for career success that exclude ethics. These perspectives suggest that individual Exxon managers may not have been making greed-based decisions, weighing corporate gains against harms to others. The situation more likely involved a failure, for the reasons discussed, to raise ethics questions in making business decisions. This explanation does not make much difference to those injured nor does it absolve those who made the decisions. It does make a difference to society and to companies seeking to understand factors that have to be overcome in any large corporation that wishes to prevent such events from occurring. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010666/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:385-408_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Hart, David W. Author-Name: Neil Brady, F. Title: Spirituality and Archetype in Organizational Life Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 409-428 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: Spirituality is an undeniable human need and is thus the subject of increasing interest among management scholars and practitioners. In this article, we propose using archetypal psychology as a framework for understanding the human need for spirituality more clearly because it provides important insights into spirituality and organizational life. Because most spiritual needs reside in the deepest aspects of the self, an archetypal approach helps us recognize not only that we have spiritual needs but also why we have them. We present three common archetypes and their implications in a management context. That is followed by an application of the archetypal approach to some of the more spiritually corrosive aspects of organizational life and a discussion of the implications of archetypes as a source of motivation. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010678/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:409-428_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Moon, Jeremy Author-Name: Crane, Andrew Author-Name: Matten, Dirk Title: Can Corporations be Citizens? Corporate Citizenship as a Metaphor for Business Participation in Society Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 429-453 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: This paper investigates whether, in theoretical terms, corporations can be citizens. The argument is based on the observation that the debate on “corporate citizenship” (CC) has only paid limited attention to the actual notion of citizenship. Where it has been discussed, authors have either largely left the concept of CC unquestioned, or applied rather unidimensional and decontextualized notions of citizenship to the corporate sphere. The paper opens with a critical discussion of a major contribution to the CC literature, the work of Logsdon and Wood (Wood and Logsdon 2001; Logsdon and Wood 2002). It continues with a consideration of the nature and role of metaphors for business and of the contestable nature of the political concept of citizenship. It evaluates corporations as citizens through a four-dimensional framework of democratic citizenship offered by Stokes (2002). The analysis suggests that corporations do not easily fit the “liberal minimalist” model of citizenship. It finds, however some possibilities for fit with the three more participatory models. The paper concludes by cautioning against basing corporate citizenship on legal and administrative status or identity, and mapping out specific criteria by which we might determine whether corporations could be considered as citizens by virtue of their participation in processes of governance. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X0001068X/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:429-453_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Moriarty, Jeffrey Title: On the Relevance of Political Philosophy to Business Ethics Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 455-473 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: The central problems of political philosophy (e.g., legitimate authority, distributive justice) mirror the central problems of business ethics. The question naturally arises: should political theories be applied to problems in business ethics? If a version of egalitarianism is the correct theory of justice for states, for example, does it follow that it is the correct theory of justice for businesses? If states should be democratically governed by their citizens, should businesses be democratically managed by their employees? Most theorists who have considered these questions, including John Rawls in Political Liberalism, and Robert Phillips and Joshua Margolis in a 1999 article, have said “no.” They claim that states and businesses are different kinds of entities, and hence require different theories of justice. I challenge this claim. While businesses differ from states, the difference is one of degree, not one of kind. Business ethics has much to learn from political philosophy. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010691/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:455-473_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Sonenshein, Scott Title: Business Ethics and Internal Social Criticism Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 475-498 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present an understanding of business ethics based on a theory of internal social criticism. Internal social criticism focuses on how members of a business organization debate the meanings of their shared traditions for the purpose of locating and correcting hypocrisy. Organizations have thick moral cultures that allow them to be self-governing moral communities. By considering organizations as interpretive moral communities, I challenge the conventional notion that moral criticism is based primarily on exogenous moral principles delivered by outside critics. I describe an interpretive process of business ethics and develop a theoretical model of internal social criticism. I also propose that organizational identification serves as a mechanism for inducing ethical behavior. I conclude by calling for more research that understands the development and use of existing moral principles inside of organizations. File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010708/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:475-498_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Caldwell, Cam Title: Leading with Meaning: Using Covenantal Leadership to Build a Better Organization - Leading with Meaning: Using Covenantal Leadership to Build a Better OrganizationMoses Pava New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. 192 pp. ISBN 1403961328, hc., $25 Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 499-505 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X0001071X/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:499-505_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Duska, Ronald Title: Plus ça Change, Plus c’est la Même Chose - Power Failure: The Inside Story of the Collapse of EnronMimi Swartz with Sherron Watkins New York: Doubleday, 2003 - Final Accounting: Ambition, Greed, and the Fall of Arthur AndersenBarbara Ley Toffler, with Jennifer Reingold New York: Broadway Books, 2003 - After the BallPatricia Beard New York: HarperCollins, 2003 Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 507-520 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010721/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:507-520_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Koehn, Jo Lynne Title: Accounting Ethics - Accounting EthicsRonald F. Duska and Brenda Shay Duska Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, 277 pp. Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 521-529 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010733/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:521-529_01 Template-type: ReDIF-Article 1.0 Author-Name: Landau, Iddo Title: The Law and Sexual Harassment - The Law of Sexual Harassment: A CritiqueMane Hajdin Selinsgrove, Pa.: Susquehanna University Press, 2002. 271 pp. Journal: Business Ethics Quarterly Pages: 531-536 Issue: 3 Volume: 15 Year: 2005 Month: July Abstract: File-URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00010745/type/journal_article File-Function: link to article abstract page File-Format: text/html Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:15:y:2005:i:03:p:531-536_01